You required to write 400-500 words to describe your learning experience.
You can use the following questions to guide your writing entry:
• What did I read for this topic, apart from the notes? (Include information and references
from a range of sources)
• What was the most interesting thing I read for this topic – why was that?
• What material didn’t I find interesting – why was that?
• What did I previously think was true, but now know to be wrong?
• What did we not cover that I expected we should?
• What have I changed my mind about as a result of this topic?
• What is one thing I learned in this topic that I may be able to use in future?
• What am I still unsure about? What would I like to learn more about?
• What issues(s) interested me and would I like to study in more detail?
• What are my ideas for action, based on this topic?
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and referencing |
| 10.0 to >8.4 pts
Excellent
Assignment completely adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing. |
8.4 to >7.4 pts
Very Good
Assignment completely adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines with few inconsistencies with APIC Harvard style of referencing. |
7.4 to >6.4 pts
Good
Assignment mostly adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing. |
6.4 to >4.9 pts
Satisfactory
Assignment show some adherence to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing. |
4.9 to >0 pts
Not Satisfactory
Assignment is not presented as per APIC assessment presentation guidelines and includes insufficient application of APIC Harvard style of referencing. |
|
10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Expression |
| 20.0 pts
Excellent
The writing is fluent and coherent with excellent presentation exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated with no minor spelling or typing error |
16.8 pts
Very Good
The writing is fluent and coherent with very good presentation exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated with minor spelling or typing error. |
14.8 pts
Good
The writing is fluent and coherent with good presentation exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated with few spellings or typing error. |
12.8 pts
Satisfactory
The writing is satisfactory exhibiting majority of grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated with some spelling or typing errors but may need to interpret. |
9.8 pts
Not Satisfactory
The writing is poor with no logical flow and many grammatical errors. |
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of best practice models |
| 30.0 pts
Excellent
Evidence of excellent reference to supporting literature in reviewing best practice models with significant synthesis of arguments. Review presented is rigours in validating the significance of best practice model in managerial decision making pertaining to quality and risk management. |
25.2 pts
Very Good
Evidence of strong reference to supporting literature in reviewing best practice models with significant synthesis of arguments and evidence of independent research to validate the significance of best practice model in managerial decision making pertaining to quality and risk management. |
22.2 pts
Good
Evidence of good reference to supporting literature in reviewing best practice models with good interpretation of model significance in managerial decision making pertaining to quality and risk management. |
19.2 pts
Satisfactory
Use of some supporting literature with limited interpretation of models and their significance in managerial decision-making pertaining to quality and risk management. |
14.7 pts
Vot Satisfactory
Lack of evidence of sufficient use of literature and limited interpretation of the models. No evidence of critical review. |
|
30.0 pts |
| Total Points: 100.0 |
