Write 400-500 words to describe your learning experience,What was the most interesting thing I read for this topic – why was that? • What material didn’t I find interesting – why was that? • What did I previously think was true, but now know to be wrong? • What did we not cover that I expected we should?

You required to write 400-500 words to describe your learning experience.
You can use the following questions to guide your writing entry:
• What did I read for this topic, apart from the notes? (Include information and references
from a range of sources)
• What was the most interesting thing I read for this topic – why was that?
• What material didn’t I find interesting – why was that?
• What did I previously think was true, but now know to be wrong?
• What did we not cover that I expected we should?
• What have I changed my mind about as a result of this topic?
• What is one thing I learned in this topic that I may be able to use in future?
• What am I still unsure about? What would I like to learn more about?
• What issues(s) interested me and would I like to study in more detail?
• What are my ideas for action, based on this topic?

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and referencing
10.0 to >8.4 pts

Excellent

Assignment completely adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing.

8.4 to >7.4 pts

Very Good

Assignment completely adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines with few inconsistencies with APIC Harvard style of referencing.

7.4 to >6.4 pts

Good

Assignment mostly adheres to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing.

6.4 to >4.9 pts

Satisfactory

Assignment show some adherence to APIC assessment presentation guidelines and APIC Harvard style of referencing.

4.9 to >0 pts

Not Satisfactory

Assignment is not presented as per APIC assessment presentation guidelines and includes insufficient application of APIC Harvard style of referencing.

 

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Expression
20.0 pts

Excellent

The writing is fluent and coherent with excellent presentation exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated with no minor spelling or typing error

16.8 pts

Very Good

The writing is fluent and coherent with very good presentation exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated with minor spelling or typing error.

14.8 pts

Good

The writing is fluent and coherent with good presentation exhibiting grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated with few spellings or typing error.

12.8 pts

Satisfactory

The writing is satisfactory exhibiting majority of grammatically correct sentences that are appropriately punctuated with some spelling or typing errors but may need to interpret.

9.8 pts

Not Satisfactory

The writing is poor with no logical flow and many grammatical errors.

 

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of best practice models
30.0 pts

Excellent

Evidence of excellent reference to supporting literature in reviewing best practice models with significant synthesis of arguments. Review presented is rigours in validating the significance of best practice model in managerial decision making pertaining to quality and risk management.

25.2 pts

Very Good

Evidence of strong reference to supporting literature in reviewing best practice models with significant synthesis of arguments and evidence of independent research to validate the significance of best practice model in managerial decision making pertaining to quality and risk management.

22.2 pts

Good

Evidence of good reference to supporting literature in reviewing best practice models with good interpretation of model significance in managerial decision making pertaining to quality and risk management.

19.2 pts

Satisfactory

Use of some supporting literature with limited interpretation of models and their significance in managerial decision-making pertaining to quality and risk management.

14.7 pts

Vot Satisfactory

Lack of evidence of sufficient use of literature and limited interpretation of the models. No evidence of critical review.

 

30.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!