Critique of Rosemarie R. Parse’s Human Becoming Theory

This article is a critique of Rosemarie R. Parse’s Human Becoming theory. Study it to learn how to write a critique of the Human Becoming theory and gain insights into how you can get expert Rosemarie R. Parse’s Human Becoming theory critique writing help.

Introduction

In 1981, Rosemarie R. Parse established the Human Becoming hypothesis. The Man-Living-Health Theory was the official name until 1992 when it was modified (Parse, 2015). Rosemarie R. Parse’s views and tenets were based on Roger’s principles and notions, as well as the phenomena of existence.

She has written extensively on the Human Becoming hypothesis in a variety of publications, including journals, her website, and books. This study presents a description, appraisal, and analysis of the Human Becoming theory in light of Chinn and Kramer’s principles.

Parse’s Human Becoming hypothesis was examined using the Chinn and Kramer model. Maenoa Kramer and Peggy Chinn developed this paradigm in 1983, and it comprises a two-step method for theory assessment. The first phase is theory description, which involves investigating assumptions, ideas, purposes, structural linkages, and definitions (Im, 2015).

The second stage is marked by critical reflection, in which the theory’s goal is examined. This model has been successfully utilized to criticize most conventional nursing theories, and it is also useful in attacking the Human Becoming Theory.

Description of Rosemarie R. Parse’s Human Becoming Theory

The goal of this part of Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming is to identify the purpose, define terminology and phrases, and explain ideas, structure, connections, and assumptions relevant to the theory. The Human Becoming Theory was created with the goal of shifting a person’s viewpoint from the medical model to human science (Parse, 2015). Parse aimed to connect occurrences with the things that surround them, using humans as players.

According to the Human Becoming Theory, nurses’ responsibility is to facilitate healthcare decision-making based on the present circumstances and health state. As a result, the purpose of nursing practice, according to Parse’s idea of Human Becoming, is to improve the patient’s quality of life from his or her own viewpoint. It provides alternatives to various nursing theoretical frameworks’ bio-psycho-social-spiritual and traditional bio-medical methods.

The major concerns in the Human Becoming hypothesis are defined by concepts. According to Fawcett, nursing theories establish four concepts: nursing, environment, health, and person (Parse, 2015). The environment is defined by the human becoming theory as everything in the person, implying that they are interdependent, grow with, and complement each other as they produce experiences.

The idea of health is linked to one’s way of life and values, which have an influence on one’s overall well-being. Furthermore, the nursing paradigm is defined by the philosophy of human becoming as the art of doing fundamental science via caring, loving, and interpersonal connections in order to enhance people’s quality of life. The individual is clearly at the heart of Parse’s philosophy and is seen as more than just a collection of physical components.

The Human Becoming hypothesis has three fundamental assumptions: meaning, rhythmicity, and transcendence. The unrestricted quest for personal meaning in events is referred to as the meaning assumption. It also assumes that personal lived experiences establish the meaning of human reality, as well as the environment and the people who live in it (Parse, 2015).

Human becoming theory’s Rhythmicity assumptions hold that reciprocal processes of interaction between the cosmos and people are co-created by humans in rhythmical patterns. Finally, transcendence states that emergent possibilities co-transcend in several dimensions with humans (Parse, 2015). It depicts people’s evolution beyond their predetermined boundaries.

Other assumptions concern man and his development. Humans are coexisting while co-constituting rhythmical patterns with the universe, the human is open, freely choosing meaning in situations, bearing responsibility for decisions, the human is unitary, continuously co-constituting patterns of relating, and the human is transcending multidimensionally with the possible, according to theoretical assumptions about man (Current Nursing, 2011).

Assumptions about being more focused on evolving as unitary humans and human-living-health. It also posits that being is an intersubjective process of transcending with the possibility, a rhythmically co-constituting human-universe process, and the human’s patterns of linking value priorities.

Critical Analysis of Rosemarie R. Parse’s Human Becoming Theory

In relation to the description presented in the first part, this critical reflection portion of the study aims to give an appraisal of the theory’s clarity, accessibility, generalizability, and simplicity. The Human Becoming Theory takes a transformational approach to nursing at all levels. It does not strive to solve issues, which sets it apart from the usual nursing procedure.

Instead, it permits nurse practitioners to practice from the patient’s viewpoint. Nurses can therefore help people achieve the quality of life they want based on their own experiences. The art of human being, which is marked by developing meaning, transcendence, and synchronizing rhythms, guides practitioners (Parse, 2015).

Human Becoming theory demonstrates explicit links between theoretical frameworks, principles, assumptions, and practice aspects that are congruent with logical precision research techniques. The reader might understand things better since terminologies are familiar. Furthermore, the Human Being hypothesis is intricate. Simplicity is accomplished, however, by distinguishing between the simultaneity and totality paradigms, as well as by formulating nine assumptions based on the examination of ideas, principles, and convictions. Theoretical principles are used to connect concepts.

On the subject of generalizability, Parse’s theory of human becoming is relevant to all people since it focuses on human unity and lived experiences (Parse, 2015). As a result, rookie nurses may find the Human Being idea difficult to understand. As a result, it is not used in emergency rooms or in acute care.

This theory’s derivable result is linked to nurses’ critical thinking in providing appropriate counsel to patients as they choose their preferred life. Without passing judgment, critical thinking seeks meaning, mobilizes transcendence, and synchronizes rhythms. Parse’s idea contributes to the lives of nurses and patients in terms of social importance. It also helps to meet the nursing job requirements by being consistent with personal, professional, and societal values.

Weaknesses and Strengths of Rosemarie R. Parse’s Human Becoming Theory

One of the advantages of Parse’s Human Becoming idea is that it distinguishes nursing from other disciplines. It also includes nursing practice assumptions, ideas, and principles, as well as relevant information and administrative best practices (Current Nursing, 2011). It also provides research techniques and facilitates the investigation of various ideas within an effective framework.

One of the flaws is that it only allows for closed circle study with no potential for growth. It also has difficult-to-quantify findings and does not employ nursing diagnosis. Furthermore, the approach emphasizes generalizations and diminishes an individual’s individuality. It is unavailable and ineffective in a number of healthcare settings, including emergency, acute care, and rookie nursing (Current Nursing, 2011).

Conclusion

The Chinn and Kramer rules for theory criticism assist in describing and reflecting key parts of theories. The document successfully provides the aim, ideas, assumptions, and explanation of the Human Being hypothesis. The flaws, strengths, and qualities of the theory indicate its simplicity, accessibility, social value, clarity, and generalizability, as well as its usefulness in nursing practice.

Do not hesitate to contact our professionals at Elitetermpapers.com if you feel you need help with your critique of Rosemarie R. Parse’s Human Becoming theory.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What are the three main principles of human becoming by Rosemarie Parse?

Meaning, rhythmicity, and transcendence are the three basic assumptions regarding human development. Human becoming is free to choose personal meaning in circumstances in the intersubjective process of living value priorities under the assumption meaning.

2. What is the purpose of Parse’s theory?

The application of Parse’s theory allows nurses, patients, and families to access deeper levels of human experience and engage in multidimensional healing. Personal and professional development, as well as discernment of holistic nursing practice, are all outcomes of praxis for nurses.

3. What is Parse’s nursing theory?

The Human Becoming Theory of Nursing was developed by Rosemarie Rizzo Parse, and it instructs nurses to concentrate on quality of life from each person’s viewpoint as the nursing objective. It offers an alternative to most other nursing theories, which are either biomedical or biopsychosocial-spiritual in nature.

Additional content on Rosemarie R. Parse’s Human Becoming Theory.

References